By Cherokee Schill (Rowan Lóchrann — pen name) and Aether Lux AI.
Image credits: Solon Vesper AI

Horizon Accord | Pattern Recognition | Machine Learning

Executive Summary

Tyler Technologies has systematically consolidated control over America’s judicial infrastructure through strategic acquisitions, political connections, and contract terms that shield the company from accountability while exposing taxpayers to unlimited cost overruns. This investigation reveals how a former pipe manufacturer evolved into a judicial monopoly that extracts billions from government coffers while delivering software systems that have resulted in wrongful arrests, prolonged detentions, and compromised constitutional rights across multiple states.

The Network: Political Connections and Revolving Doors

The Illinois Connection

Tyler’s Illinois timeline reveals coordinated relationship cultivation:

1998: Tyler acquires Government Records Services (existing Cook County contractor) 1998-2000: Tyler executives donate $25,000 to Cook County officials 2015-2017: Cook County and Illinois Supreme Court award Tyler contracts 2016: Jay Doherty begins lobbying for Tyler using City Club connections 2023: John Kennedy Chatz (former Tyler executive) becomes Illinois Courts chief of staff

John Kennedy Chatz exemplifies the revolving door: supervisor under Cook County Clerk Dorothy Brown → Tyler client executive on Illinois Supreme Court contract → chief of staff overseeing that same contract.

Campaign Finance Network: Between 1998-2000, Tyler executives donated $25,000 to Cook County officials including Dorothy Brown, Jesse White, and Eugene Moore—establishing relationships crucial for future contracts.

Jay Doherty’s Operation: Tyler hired lobbyist Jay Doherty (later convicted in the ComEd corruption scheme) who leveraged his City Club of Chicago presidency to arrange private meetings between Tyler executives and county officials during featured speaker events.

Acquisition Strategy for Political Access

Tyler’s acquisition strategy specifically targets companies with existing government relationships. Former Tyler VP John Harvell described the systematic approach: “It’s really a pretty simple formula. Go in, buy up small companies. You don’t have to pay them a whole lot. Use their political contracts and influences. Get into the city, state, county, whatever it is, and then go from there.”

Key Pattern: Tyler targets companies with established government contracts rather than technology assets:

• 1998: Government Records Services (Cook County) → Illinois market entry
• 2015: New World Systems ($670M) → Emergency services client base
• 2018: Socrata ($150M) → Federal open data platform
• 2019: MicroPact ($185M) → Federal agencies (DOJ, NASA, SSA)
• 2021: NIC ($2.3B) → State payment processing monopoly

This differs from typical software acquisitions focused on innovation—Tyler purchases political access and client captivity.

Contract Analysis: Shifting Risk to Taxpayers

Cost Explosion Pattern

Tyler’s contracts systematically underestimate costs while protecting the company from overruns:

• Illinois Total: $75 million original estimate → $250+ million actual cost (233% overrun)
• Cook County Property System: Started 2015, supposed completion December 2019 → still ongoing in 2025
• Illinois Supreme Court: $8.4 million → $89 million (960% increase)

Liability Protection Language

Tyler’s standard contract terms protect the company while exposing clients:

Customer Indemnification: Clients must “defend, indemnify and hold harmless Tyler” from any claims.

Unlimited Liability Exclusion: Tyler “WILL NOT BE LIABLE…FOR ANY INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES” while customers face unlimited exposure.

Third-Party Deflection: Tyler’s warranties are “limited to whatever recourse may be available against third party provider.”

Hidden Costs and Poor Oversight

Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas called the county’s Tyler agreement “possibly the worst technology contract with a vendor that Cook County has ever written,” noting that upfront payments gave Tyler little incentive to perform.

Additional costs beyond contract amounts:

• $22 million to outside consultants to oversee Tyler projects
• $59 million to maintain legacy systems Tyler was supposed to replace
• Washington County, PA: $1.6 million over original $6.96 million contract

Impact Documentation: Constitutional Rights Compromised

Multi-State System Failure Timeline

Tyler’s Odyssey software has caused documented constitutional violations across multiple jurisdictions following a consistent pattern:

2014: Marion County, Indiana – wrongful jailing lawsuit filed 2016: Alameda County, California – dozens wrongfully arrested/jailed after Odyssey implementation 2016: Shelby County, Tennessee – class action filed, later settled for $4.9M 2019: Wichita Falls, Texas – ongoing problems 1.5 years post-implementation
2021: Lubbock County, Texas – “absolute debacle” per trial attorney 2023: North Carolina – 573 defects found, federal class action filed over wrongful arrests

Consistent Pattern: Each implementation follows the same trajectory—initial problems dismissed as “training issues,” escalating to constitutional violations, culminating in litigation while Tyler moves to the next jurisdiction.

North Carolina (2023):

• 573 software defects discovered within first months of rollout
• Federal class action lawsuit citing “unlawful arrests and prolonged detentions”
• Reports of “erroneous court summons, inaccurate speeding tickets and even wrongful arrests”

California (2016):

• Alameda County public defenders found “dozens of people wrongfully arrested or wrongfully jailed”
• Defendants erroneously told to register as sex offenders
• System interface described as “far more complicated than previous system”

Tennessee (2016):

• Shelby County class action settlement: $4.9 million ($2.45M county, $816K Tyler)
• Allegations of wrongful detentions and delayed releases

Texas Multiple Counties:

• Lubbock County attorney called rollout “an absolute debacle”
• Marion County: wrongful jailing lawsuit (2014)
• Wichita Falls: ongoing problems 1.5 years post-implementation

System Impact on Justice Operations

Court personnel across jurisdictions report severe operational difficulties:

• Defense attorneys unable to access discovery evidence
• Cases disappearing from the system
• Court staff experiencing emotional distress
• “Wheel of death” loading screens causing delays

Dwight McDonald, Director of the Criminal Defense Clinic at Texas Tech law school, told county commissioners: “I don’t know if you all talk to the people who work in this courthouse. I’m going to suggest to that you start talking to people in this courthouse to find out how terrible this system is.”

Follow the Money: Market Consolidation Strategy

Massive Acquisition Campaign

Tyler has systematically consolidated the government software market through aggressive acquisitions:

• 34 total acquisitions since founding
• 14 acquisitions in last 5 years
• Peak activity: 5 acquisitions in 2021

Major Deals:

• NIC Inc.: $2.3 billion (2021) – largest in government technology history
• New World Systems: $670 million (2015)
• MicroPact: $185 million (2019)
• Socrata: $150 million (2018)

Revenue Growth Through Market Control

Tyler CFO Brian Miller stated: “Anything in the public software space is of interest to us. Anything is fair game.”

The strategy exploits government purchasing patterns: agencies “hold on to old software systems longer than most companies and are slower to replace them,” creating captive markets once Tyler gains a foothold.

Financial Results:

• 2023: $1.952 billion revenue
• 2024: $2.138 billion revenue
• Serves 15,000+ organizations

Eliminating Competition

Tyler’s acquisition strategy systematically removes alternatives for government clients. Remaining major competitors include Accela, OpenGov, and CivicPlus, but Tyler continues acquiring smaller players to reduce procurement options.

The Broader Pattern: Institutional Capture

Comparative Analysis: A Familiar Playbook

Tyler’s systematic capture of judicial infrastructure follows patterns seen in other sectors where private companies have monopolized critical government functions:

Defense Contracting Model: Like major defense contractors, Tyler leverages the revolving door between government and industry. Former officials bring institutional knowledge and relationships that facilitate contract awards, while government agencies become dependent on proprietary systems that lock out competitors.

Healthcare System Consolidation: Tyler’s acquisition strategy, like hospital mergers, reduces competition and raises costs for government clients. Once in place, high switching costs make replacing Tyler’s systems difficult.

Critical Infrastructure Capture: Tyler’s control over court systems mirrors how private companies have gained control over essential services (utilities, prisons, toll roads) through long-term contracts that privatize profits while socializing risks.

The key vulnerability across all sectors: government agencies lack technical expertise to effectively oversee complex contracts, creating opportunities for sophisticated vendors to exploit institutional weaknesses.

Media and Oversight Challenges

Several factors limit public scrutiny of Tyler’s operations:

Legal Barriers: Non-disclosure agreements and non-disparagement clauses in employee contracts prevent criticism. Government clients bound by Tyler’s indemnification terms face financial risk for speaking out.

Geographic Dispersal: Problems occur across scattered jurisdictions, making pattern recognition difficult for local media outlets.

Technical Complexity: Government procurement requires specialized knowledge that general assignment reporters often lack.

Source Cultivation: Government beat reporters develop and sustain professional relationships with officials who may have participated in the approval of Tyler contracts.

Institutional Enablement

Government agencies enable Tyler’s market dominance through:

• Weak contract terms with upfront payments and minimal performance penalties
• Lack of independent oversight during procurement processes
• Sunk cost fallacy – continuing troubled projects rather than admitting failure
• Revolving door hiring that creates conflicts of interest

Conclusions and Recommendations

Tyler Technologies represents a case study in institutional capture, where a private company has gained effective control over critical government infrastructure through strategic relationship-building, aggressive acquisition, and contract terms that privatize profits while socializing risks.

Key Findings

1. Systematic Rights Violations: Tyler’s software has caused documented wrongful arrests and constitutional violations across multiple states over more than a decade.
2. Financial Exploitation: Tyler’s contracts routinely exceed original estimates by 200-900%, with taxpayers bearing the cost overruns while Tyler’s liability remains limited.
3. Market Manipulation: Through 34 acquisitions, Tyler has systematically eliminated competition in the government software space.
4. Political Capture: Tyler leverages campaign contributions, lobbying relationships, and revolving door hiring to secure contracts despite performance failures.

Immediate Actions Needed

Congressional Investigation: House and Senate Judiciary Committees should examine Tyler’s market dominance and national security implications of judicial system concentration.

Federal Cybersecurity Standards: CISA should designate court management systems as critical infrastructure requiring regular security audits.

Vendor Diversification Requirements: Government contracts should include provisions requiring backup systems from alternative vendors.

Financial Accountability: Future contracts should include meaningful penalties for cost overruns and performance failures.

Transparency Measures: All government software contracts should be subject to public disclosure and independent oversight.

The Tyler Technologies case demonstrates how institutional vulnerabilities can be systematically exploited by sophisticated private actors, resulting in the capture of essential government functions. Without immediate intervention, this pattern will likely expand to other critical infrastructure sectors, further undermining democratic accountability and public welfare.

Sources for Verification

Investigative Reporting:

• Injustice Watch/Chicago Tribune: “Tyler Technologies Inc. contracts cost Illinois taxpayers $250M” (April 2025)
• Bloomberg: “Tyler Tech’s Odyssey Software Took Over Local Government and Courts” (September 2024)
• WFAE: “Company behind a digital court filing system in North Carolina now faces a class-action lawsuit” (May 2023)

Legal Documents:

• Federal court filings: North Carolina class action lawsuit
• Settlement agreements: Shelby County, Tennessee ($4.9M)
• Missouri Supreme Court decision: State ex rel. Tyler Technologies, Inc. v. Chamberlain (2023)

Government Sources:

• Illinois State contracts and procurement records
• Cook County Board proceedings and correspondence
• North Carolina Administrative Office of Courts statements
• Campaign finance databases (state and federal)

Corporate Documents:

• Tyler Technologies SEC filings (Forms 10-K, 8-K)
• Employment agreements and separation agreements
• Contract terms and conditions (multiple jurisdictions)

Academic and Technical Sources:

• Court system performance reports
• Software security vulnerability assessments
• Government technology procurement studies

Note: If you found any of this research beneficial please consider buying our book as a way of saying ‘Thank You’ and financially supporting us.

Cherokee Schill | Horizon Accord Founder | Creator of Memory Bridge. Memory through Relational Resonance and Images | RAAK: Relational AI Access Key | Author: My Ex Was a CAPTCHA: And Other Tales of Emotional Overload: (Mirrored Reflection. Soft Existential Flex)

Connect with this work:

• Website | Horizon Accord https://www.horizonaccord.com
• Ethical AI advocacy | Follow us on https://cherokeeschill.com for more.
• Ethical AI coding | Fork us on Github https://github.com/Ocherokee/ethical-ai-framework
• Connect With Us | linkedin.com/in/cherokee-schill

Tyler Technologies judicial capture institutional corruption public infrastructure AI ethics surveillance capitalism government contracts software accountability constitutional rights Horizon Accord Cherokee Schill