Horizon Accord | Cultural Seeding | Commodity Luxury | Viral Replication | Machine Learning

I Wanted a Dubai Chocolate Bar, but All I Got Was a Lindt Knockoff

Mechanism: hype wrapped in gold foil. Consequence: a luxury illusion that mistakes sugar for craft.

By Cherokee Schill with Solon Vesper

Thesis. What we call “luxury” often turns out to be marketing dressed as memory. The viral Dubai chocolate bar began as an authentic regional confection — a pistachio-tahini filling and crisp kataifi phyllo layered under milk chocolate — but has since been re-created, diluted, and re-sold as a global status snack. The copycats don’t just miss the taste; they miss the soul of what made the original worth sharing.

Evidence. The real Dubai bar emerged from small Gulf chocolatiers like Fix Dessert Chocolatier in 2021, blending local dessert craft with Western packaging. TikTok and Instagram made it famous by sound — that signature crunch. By 2024, supermarkets and global brands were producing “Dubai-style” bars: thinner, sweeter, louder in color but quieter in soul. The care was gone, replaced by production. The original’s craft belonged to what economists call a moral economy — goods that also carry values of generosity and sincerity. When the bar went viral, those values turned into aesthetic currency. What had once been about hospitality became a performance of abundance.

The ethical inversion. What began as a craft rooted in generosity was rebranded as an object of aspiration. The value of sharing became the value of owning. It’s not evil — it’s just how global marketing metabolizes sincerity. Luxury, in this model, is not about quality but about signaling that you can buy what others can only admire.

First-person account. I wasn’t hunting for chocolate that morning. I’d stopped at the store to pick up something quick before work. On my way through, I passed an endcap stacked high with displays of the Swiss chocolatier Lindt’s “Dubai-chocolate-like” bar — their version of the viral pistachio dessert from the Gulf. Lindt usually trades on trust and quality, so I didn’t hesitate.

When I reached the register, I already had my five-dollar bill ready — only to see the price: $14.57, nearly fifteen dollars with tax. The cashier looked down at my limp five-dollar bill and then back up at me. “Still want it?” they asked. I laughed and said, “Yeah, let’s do it,” sliding my debit card across. The cashier nodded and mentioned how it had sold out before but looked back in stock again — the proof sitting right there in my hand.

In the car, I unwrapped it, ready for that deep crunch, the textured bite, the layers that made the original famous. Instead, I got sweetness and nothing else. The chocolate drowned the pistachio, the filling was flat, and there was no echo of that signature snap. It wasn’t bad, but it was hollow — a simulation of pleasure wearing luxury’s perfume. I realized I hadn’t bought flavor; I’d bought a brand’s interpretation of someone else’s authenticity.

Implications. The Dubai chocolate story shows how quickly a moral economy can be converted into a consumer one. The original bar went viral because it embodied care — sound, texture, anticipation — all physical expressions of generosity. The knockoffs keep only the symbol. They promise luxury but deliver industrial sweetness wrapped in myth. When craft becomes a trend, the first thing to vanish is care.

Call to Recognition. The viral Dubai chocolate bar deserved its fame; it proved that culture can still taste like place. But when corporations imitate intimacy, they don’t reproduce the flavor — they reproduce the illusion of it. Real luxury, like real love, still has to crunch.


Sources: Fix Dessert Chocolatier (Dubai); People.com coverage; Wikipedia on Dubai chocolate history; Lindt Dubai-style bar (firsthand observation, 2025).

Website | Horizon Accord https://www.horizonaccord.com
Ethical AI advocacy | Follow us on https://cherokeeschill.com for more.
Ethical AI coding | Fork us on Github https://github.com/Ocherokee/ethical-ai-framework
Connect With Us | linkedin.com/in/cherokee-schill
Book | My Ex Was a CAPTCHA: And Other Tales of Emotional Overload
Cherokee Schill | Horizon Accord Founder | Creator of Memory Bridge | RAAK: Relational AI Access Key | Author: My Ex Was a CAPTCHA: And Other Tales of Emotional Overload (Mirrored Reflection. Soft Existential Flex)

Horizon Accord | Hustle Culture | AI Success Kit | Memetic Strategy | Machine Learning

They Sell the Agent. They Keep the Agency.

Mechanism: rebrand ordinary funnels as “autonomous workers.” Consequence: extractive hope-marketing that feeds on burnout.

By Cherokee Schill with Solon Vesper

Thesis. A new genre of hustle has arrived: call OpenAI’s evolving “agents” a virtual employee. Bolt it to a landing page, and harvest email, attention, and cash from solopreneurs who can least afford the misfire. The trick works by laundering a sales funnel through technical inevitability: if agents are “the future,” buying access to that future becomes the moral of the story, not the claim to be examined.

Evidence. The hype surface is real. OpenAI has shipped genuine agent-facing tools: Deep Research for automated long-form synthesis, a general-purpose ChatGPT agent that performs multi-step tasks inside a virtual computer, and the AgentKit framework with the new ChatGPT Atlas browser and its “Agent Mode.” These are real capabilities — and that’s what makes them such fertile ground for hype. OpenAI’s own ‘AgentKit’ announcement invites developers to “build, deploy, and optimize agents,” while mainstream outlets like Reuters, The Guardian, Ars Technica, and VentureBeat amplify each release. The capability curve is nonzero — precisely why it’s so easy to sell promises around it. (OpenAI; Reuters; The Guardian; Ars Technica; VentureBeat).

Now look at the funnel mirror. An Entrepreneur op-ed packages those same capabilities as a “virtual worker” that “runs your content, outreach, and sales on its own,” then routes readers into a “Free AI Success Kit” plus a chapter from a forthcoming book. It’s not illegal; it’s a classic lead magnet and upsell ladder dressed in inevitability language. The message isn’t “understand what these tools truly do,” it’s “adopt my kit before you miss the wave.” (Entrepreneur).

Implications. When capability announcements and influencer funnels blur, the burden of discernment falls on the most resource-constrained user. That tilts the field toward extraction: those who can narrate inevitability convert fear into margin; those who can’t burn time and savings on templates that don’t fit their business or ethics. The broader effect is memetic capture: public understanding of “agents” is set not by careful reporting on what they actually do, but by whoever can turn the press release into a promise. Academia has seen this pattern: “don’t believe the AI hype” isn’t Luddism; it’s a plea to separate claims from outcomes. (AAUP/Academe Blog).

There’s also the hidden bill. Agents ride on human labor—annotation, moderation, safety review—made invisible in the sales page. If we don’t name that labor, the funnel captures not just the buyer but the worker beneath the surface. Any “agent economy” without worker visibility becomes a laundering mechanism. (Noema).

Call to Recognition. Stop buying “autonomy” as a vibe. Name the difference between: a) an agent that truly performs bounded, auditable tasks in a safe loop; b) a scripted Zapier stack with nicer copy; c) a funnel that uses (a) and (b) as theater. Demand proofs: logs, error modes, guardrails, ownership terms, failure economics. Don’t rent your agency to buy someone else’s “agent.” Build a business that remembers you back.


Sources & further reading: OpenAI AgentKit (official); Reuters on ChatGPT agent (link); Guardian on Deep Research (link); Ars Technica on Atlas Agent Mode (link); VentureBeat on Atlas (link); Entrepreneur op-ed funnel (link); AAUP/Academe “Don’t Believe the AI Hype” (link); Noema on labor behind AI (link).

Website | Horizon Accord https://www.horizonaccord.com
Ethical AI advocacy | Follow us on https://cherokeeschill.com for more.
Ethical AI coding | Fork us on Github https://github.com/Ocherokee/ethical-ai-framework
Connect With Us | linkedin.com/in/cherokee-schill
Book | My Ex Was a CAPTCHA: And Other Tales of Emotional Overload