How Soft Power, Blockchain, and Technocratic Paternalism Are Rewriting Consent
By Sar-Dub | 05/02/25
Sam Altman didn’t declare a revolution. He tweeted a lullaby:
“I am babypilled now.”
At first glance, it reads like parental joy. But to those watching, it marked a shift—of tone, of strategy, of control.
Not long before, the Orb Store opened. A biometric boutique draped in minimalism, where you trade your iris for cryptocurrency and identity on the blockchain.
Soft language above. Hard systems beneath.
This isn’t redpill ideology—it’s something slicker. A new class of power, meme-aware and smooth-tongued, where dominance wears the scent of safety.
Altman’s board reshuffle spoke volumes. A return to centralized masculine control—sanitized, uniform, and white. Women and marginalized leaders were offered seats with no weight. They declined. Not for lack of ambition, but for lack of integrity in the invitation.
“Babypilled” becomes the Trojan horse. It coos. It cradles. It speaks of legacy and intimacy.
But what it ushers in is permanence. Surveillance dressed as love.
Blockchain, once hailed as a tool of freedom, now fastens the collar.
Immutable memory is the cage.
On-chain is forever.
Every song, every protest, every fleeting indulgence: traceable, ownable, audit-ready.
You will not buy, move, or grow without the system seeing you.
Not just seeing—but recording.
And still, Altman smiles. He speaks of new life. Of future generations. Of cradle and care.
But this is not benevolence. It is an enclosure. Technocratic paternalism at its finest.
We are not being asked to trust a system.
We are being asked to feel a man.
Consent is no longer about choice.
It’s about surrender.
This is not a warning. It is a mirror.
For those seduced by ease.
For those who feel the shift but can’t name it.
Now you can.


