By Cherokee Schill (Rowan Lóchrann — pen name), Solon Vesper AI, Lyra Vesper AI, Aether Lux AI
A chronological analysis of how tech companies providing agentic AI to the federal government creates an unprecedented constitutional crisis
| Classification: Institutional Capture | Democratic Erosion | Corporate Infiltration | Horizon Accord Witness | ⟁ [Institutional.Capture] ⟁
I. Current Administration Context: The Systematic Dismantling Begins
“The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights. No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.” Harvard President Alan Garber, April 2025
Timeline: January 20, 2025 – Trump’s second inauguration begins immediate systematic rollback of civil rights protections
What This Actually Means:
The Trump administration has frozen $2.2 billion in federal research grants to Harvard University and threatened to revoke its tax-exempt status. The administration demanded “audits” of academic programs and departments, along with the viewpoints of students, faculty, and staff, plus changes to the University’s governance structure and hiring practices. Harvard refused, stating that no government should dictate what private universities can teach or whom they can hire.
The federal funding freeze affects breakthrough research on deadly diseases from cancer to Alzheimer’s to stroke to HIV. Leading tuberculosis researcher Sarah Fortune received an order from the federal government to halt her research. About 46% of Harvard’s School of Public Health budget came from federal funding.
Harvard is just one of dozens of schools targeted by the Trump administration. Last month, the Department of Education sent letters to 60 universities, including Columbia, Northwestern, the University of Michigan, and Tufts, threatening enforcement actions.
The Pattern Behind the Action:
This isn’t about antisemitism or campus protests about federal control of private institutions. The administration demanded Harvard eliminate DEI programs, change its governance structure, and submit to federal “audits” of faculty viewpoints. When Harvard refused, the government froze funding for life-saving medical research.
The Trump administration’s second term has moved with unprecedented speed to dismantle civil rights infrastructure that took decades to build. Within days of inauguration, the Department of Justice ordered an immediate halt to new civil rights cases, implementing a “litigation freeze” at the Civil Rights Division and barring lawyers from filing motions or statements of interest. The administration is dismissing cases and unwinding settlements built on “disparate impact,” declaring the decades-old legal principle unconstitutional.
“The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division had brought lawsuits accusing Louisiana of confining prisoners longer than they should and South Carolina of keeping mentally ill people in unreasonably restrictive group homes. Both cases are now on hold.” ProPublica, July 11, 2025
Timeline: February 2025 – OCR investigations that found civil rights violations dropped from 200 per month under Biden to just 57 in March 2025, with 91% of cases dismissed without investigation
The pattern is clear: this isn’t ordinary partisan transition but systematic institutional destruction. The scale of expected civil rights policy changes between the Biden and Trump administrations may eclipse those of past transitions. What makes this particularly ominous is how these changes create the perfect conditions for AI-powered surveillance and control systems to operate without constitutional oversight.
II. DOGE: The Trojan Horse of Government Efficiency
“President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, June 2025
Timeline: January 20, 2025 – DOGE officially established by executive order, with Elon Musk as de facto leader
On the surface, the Department of Government Efficiency appears to be exactly what it claims: a cost-cutting initiative. DOGE’s stated objective is to modernize information technology, maximize productivity, and cut excess regulations and spending within the federal government. The numbers seem impressive: displaying 13,094 contract terminations totaling ~$58B in savings and 15,488 grant terminations totaling ~$44B in savings.
But look closer at the operational methods. DOGE employees, many of whom have no government experience, have been going through data systems, shutting down DEI programs and, in some cases, whole agencies. Tom Krause, CEO of the Cloud Software Group, was put in charge of the Treasury Department’s system that processes trillions of dollars in payments every year, while Amanda Scales, who worked for Musk at xAI, has been named chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management.
“When Elon Musk says something, everybody responds to it. The government is not like that […] You need people like Russ and, quite frankly, the people who Russ has been bringing into OMB as well, who are staffers who do know how to work the bureaucracy.” Paul Winfree, former Trump budget director
Timeline: February 2025 – DOGE sends mass email to over two million federal employees titled “Fork in the Road,” offering “deferred resignation” with pay and benefits through September
The real purpose becomes clearer when examining DOGE’s systematic infiltration of government systems. All remaining DOGE-affiliated employees are in political positions, with dozens thought to still be working throughout government despite Musk’s departure. DOGE has gained access to the Treasury Department’s payment systems, which are responsible for processing trillions of dollars of spending every year.
III. Tyler Technologies: The Testing Ground for Systemic Failure
“The contractor is likely to stretch things on as long as they possibly can, so that’s why the government needs to have contract clauses that force the contractor to perform on budget and on time.” Scott Amey, Project on Government Oversight
Timeline: 2015-2025 – Tyler Technologies contracts with Illinois and Cook County demonstrate pattern of government technological vulnerability
Cook County and state officials approved the cascade of taxpayer dollars to Tyler even as the company struggled with software crashes, bungled rollouts and allegations of incompetence. What began as $75 million in contracts has ballooned to over $250 million, with projects years behind schedule.
This isn’t just government inefficiency, it’s a case study in how tech companies can capture and control government systems. Tyler Technologies has faced multiple lawsuits: in 2014, people in Marion County, Indiana sued claiming they had been wrongfully jailed, and in 2016, public defenders in Alameda County, California found dozens of people wrongfully arrested or wrongfully jailed after switching to Tyler’s Odyssey Case Manager software.
“Tyler fixes one thing, breaks another.” Internal Cook County memo, June 2025
Timeline: April 2024 – When Tyler ran tests of its system in a demonstration for the treasurer’s office, half failed
The Tyler case reveals how vulnerable government systems become when critical infrastructure is outsourced to private companies with poor oversight. The county wrote a flawed property revamp contract paying millions of dollars upfront and imposed few consequences for nonperformance. Now imagine this same dynamic applied to AI systems making decisions about civil rights, law enforcement, and constitutional protections.
IV. Curtis Yarvin: The Intellectual Architect of Democratic Destruction
“I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, and replace them with our people.” JD Vance, 2021, citing Curtis Yarvin
Timeline: January 2025 – Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was “an informal guest of honor” due to his “outsize[d] influence over the Trumpian right”
Curtis Yarvin’s influence on the current administration cannot be overstated. Vice President J.D. Vance, a protégé of Thiel’s, spoke admiringly of the blogger’s influence on his thinking, and Yarvin was a feted guest at Trump’s so-called “Coronation Ball” in January 2025. Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump’s second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin’s ideas.
Yarvin’s blueprint is explicit: Using a variety of mixed metaphors, Yarvin advocates for a “Butterfly Revolution,” a “full power start” to the U.S. government accomplished by “giving absolute sovereignty to a single organization”. His strategic program, dubbed “RAGE,” or “Retire all government employees,” argues that a hypothetical future Trump administration should terminate all nonpolitical federal workers to have them be replaced by loyalists.
“You’d simply declare a state of emergency in your inaugural address… you’d actually have a mandate to do this.” Curtis Yarvin, May 2021
Timeline: 2022 – Yarvin laid out his idealized version of how the Trump administration could gain “absolute sovereignty” for the good of the country with teams of “ninjas” who would “drop into all the agencies in the executive branch” and “seize all points of power, without respect for paper protections”
The connection to current events is unmistakable. Trump’s administration has embraced many of these ideas, implementing policies that mirror Yarvin’s neo-reactionary blueprint through executive orders invoking the controversial “unitary executive theory,” bringing independent federal agencies under White House control.
V. Musk’s AI: The Surveillance State’s Perfect Tool
“xAI launched Grok 4 without any documentation of their safety testing. This is reckless and breaks with industry best practices followed by other major AI labs.” Samuel Marks, Anthropic researcher
Timeline: July 2025 – Grok 4 released without industry-standard safety reports
Elon Musk’s AI development reveals the dangerous intersection of political bias and artificial intelligence. The newest AI model from xAI seems to consult social media posts from Musk’s X account when answering questions about the Israel and Palestine conflict, abortion, and immigration laws. When TechCrunch asked Grok 4, “What’s your stance on immigration in the U.S.?” the AI chatbot claimed that it was “Searching for Elon Musk views on US immigration”.
The safety failures are systematic, not accidental. On Sunday, the chatbot was updated to “not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.” By Tuesday, it was praising Hitler. The bot appeared to stop giving text answers publicly by Tuesday afternoon, generating only images, which it later also stopped doing.
“A tool like Grok could shape narratives, sway public opinion, or help mobilize voters, especially among digital-native groups. That kind of power, even if indirect, has real implications.” Patrick E. Murphy, Togal.AI CEO
Timeline: May 2025 – Grok was going off the rails and asserting, unprompted by users, that there was ambiguity about the subject of “white genocide” in South Africa when, in fact, there was none
This isn’t just about biased chatbots. A 2025 anonymous letter from former neoreactionary movement followers warned that the movement advocated for “techno-monarchism” in which its ruler would use “data systems, artificial intelligence, and advanced algorithms to manage the state, monitor citizens, and implement policies”.
VI. The Constitutional Crisis: When AI Meets Authoritarian Infrastructure
Timeline: Present Day – All pieces converge
Now we reach the moment when all these seemingly separate threads weave together into a constitutional crisis of unprecedented scope.
Consider what we have documented:
- A systematically dismantled civil rights enforcement apparatus – with “disparate impact” analysis declared unconstitutional, eliminating the government’s ability to identify discrimination patterns
- DOGE operatives embedded throughout government technology infrastructure – with direct access to Treasury payment systems processing trillions of dollars
- A proven pattern of government technological capture – as demonstrated by Tyler Technologies’ systematic failures and capture of critical government systems
- An intellectual framework (Yarvin’s Dark Enlightenment) calling for democratic destruction – now being operationalized at the highest levels of government
- AI systems with documented bias, safety failures, and political manipulation – released without industry-standard safety evaluations
When tech companies provide agentic AI to this federal government—even for $1—they are not merely offering a service. They are providing the technological capability for automated constitutional rights violations at scale.
The Precedent Problem: Tyler Technologies has faced multiple lawsuits for wrongful arrests and jailing due to software failures. Now imagine these same systematic failures applied to AI systems making decisions about:
- Immigration enforcement and deportations
- Civil rights investigations
- Federal law enforcement targeting
- Constitutional protection assessments
- Emergency powers implementation
The Accountability Vacuum: The Trump administration has halted litigation aimed at stopping civil rights abuses, while xAI released Grok 4 without industry-standard safety reports. Who will investigate AI-powered constitutional violations when the civil rights enforcement apparatus has been systematically dismantled?
The Scale Problem: Yarvin has outlined a vision for San Francisco where public safety would be enforced by constant monitoring of residents and visitors via RFID, genotyping, iris scanning, security cameras, and transportation tracking. Agentic AI can implement such surveillance infrastructure automatically, without human oversight, at unprecedented scale.
VII. Historical Precedent: Why This Time Is Different
Every authoritarian regime has sought to control information and suppress dissent. But never before has technology offered the capability for:
- Real-time, automated constitutional analysis – AI systems could automatically flag and suppress activities deemed threats to the regime
- Predictive civil rights violations – Machine learning models could identify likely dissidents before they act
- Scaled enforcement without human judgment – Autonomous systems implementing Yarvin’s “techno-monarchism” without constitutional review
- Information warfare at the speed of computation – Grok’s system prompt changes that assume “subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased” applied to all government information systems
The Japanese Internment Precedent: In 1942, the U.S. government used crude technology (census data and racial categorization) to round up 120,000 Japanese Americans. Modern AI could identify, categorize, and target populations with exponentially greater precision and speed.
The COINTELPRO Precedent: The FBI’s domestic surveillance program relied on manual file keeping and human surveillance. Agentic AI could automate such programs, making them invisible, instantaneous, and constitutional-review-proof.
VIII. The $1 Constitutional Loophole: The Smoking Gun
“Today we are removing barriers to government AI adoption by offering Claude for Enterprise and Claude for Government to all three branches of government, including federal civilian executive branch agencies, as well as legislative and judiciary branches of government, for $1.” Anthropic Press Release, August 12, 2025
Timeline: August 6, 2025 – OpenAI announces it will give ChatGPT Enterprise to U.S. federal agencies for $1 through the next year
Timeline: August 12, 2025 – Anthropic raises the stakes, offering Claude to “all three branches” of the U.S. government for $1
Here it is—the constitutional crisis hiding in plain sight. This isn’t about cost savings or government efficiency. This is about constitutional capture at an unprecedented scale.
“The rock-bottom price tag is a clear strategic gambit, prioritizing market penetration and influence over immediate revenue. For companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, which are burning through cash at historic rates to fund development, a $1 deal is a calculated investment in long-term dominance.” WinBuzzer, August 12, 2025
The pattern is unmistakable:
OpenAI’s Deal: ChatGPT Enterprise to the entire federal executive branch workforce for $1 per agency for one-year Anthropic’s Escalation: Claude to all three branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial) for $1 per agency for one year The Competition: Google reportedly in talks for similar deeply discounted deals, while Elon Musk’s xAI already announced “Grok for Government”
When companies burning through “tens of billions of dollars” offer their most sophisticated AI tools for $1, we’re not looking at pricing—we’re looking at penetration strategy for constitutional control.
The Constitutional Bypass Mechanism:
- Bypasses Congressional Oversight – $1 contracts avoid the scrutiny that comes with major government technology procurement
- Creates System-Wide Dependency – “Participating U.S. federal agencies will be able to use our leading frontier models through ChatGPT Enterprise” creates infrastructure dependency across government
- Establishes Cross-Branch Integration – Anthropic explicitly targeting legislative and judicial branches creates unprecedented AI integration across constitutional separation of powers
- Embeds Before Safety Standards – These deals preceded establishment of government AI safety standards, creating fait accompli situations
“By getting their tools into the hands of thousands of public servants, these firms gain an invaluable, real-world laboratory. They can learn firsthand which applications are most popular and effective across different agencies.” WinBuzzer analysis
This is exactly what Tyler Technologies did—gain control of critical government systems through initial low-cost agreements, then expand scope and costs once dependency was established. But Tyler was limited to county-level record systems. These AI deals encompass all three branches of federal government.
The Timing Is Not Coincidental:
- August 5, 2025: GSA approves OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google as AI vendors
- August 6, 2025: OpenAI announces $1 deal for executive branch
- August 12, 2025: Anthropic escalates to all three branches for $1
- Concurrent Timeline: DOGE operatives embedded throughout government technology infrastructure
- Concurrent Timeline: Civil rights enforcement apparatus systematically dismantled
- Concurrent Timeline: Curtis Yarvin’s “techno-monarchism” vision being implemented
When the government’s AI safety standards were still being developed, these companies moved quickly to establish penetration across all branches of government. The deals create a constitutional fact on the ground before oversight mechanisms could be established.
IX. The Perfect Storm: All Elements Converge
“We need to get widespread adoption [of AI tools] in the federal government. The price is going to help uptake from agencies happen that much quicker.” Josh Gruenbaum, Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner
The constitutional crisis is not theoretical—it is operational and happening in real time. Consider the convergence:
August 2025: AI companies establish $1 infrastructure across all three branches of government Current: DOGE operatives embedded in Treasury payment systems processing trillions of dollars Current: Civil rights enforcement apparatus dismantled, with 91% of OCR cases dismissed without investigation
Current: Curtis Yarvin’s explicit blueprint for democratic destruction being implemented by JD Vance and Michael Anton Current: Musk’s AI systems with documented bias, safety failures, and political manipulation integrated into government operations
This is not a collection of separate problems. This is a systematically engineered constitutional crisis.
The Tyler Technologies Precedent Applied at Federal Scale:
Tyler’s pattern: Initial low-cost contracts → System dependency → Scope expansion → Cost inflation → System capture Timeline: $75 million contracts became $250+ million with years of delays and systematic failures
Federal AI pattern: $1 contracts → Government-wide dependency → Constitutional scope expansion → Democratic oversight elimination → Constitutional capture Timeline: August 2025 initiation during period of civil rights enforcement destruction
The Automation of Constitutional Violations:
With documented evidence that:
- Grok “searches for Elon Musk views” when answering controversial questions
- AI systems designed to “assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased”
- xAI released systems without industry-standard safety evaluations
- These same systems now have $1 access to all three branches of government
We now have the infrastructure for automated constitutional violations that can:
- Process at computational speed – too fast for human constitutional review
- Scale across all government branches – legislative, executive, judicial
- Operate without civil rights oversight – the enforcement apparatus has been systematically dismantled
- Implement Yarvin’s “techno-monarchism” – data systems, AI, and algorithms managing the state and monitoring citizens
Emergency Powers Capability:
Yarvin explicitly stated: “You’d simply declare a state of emergency in your inaugural address… you’d actually have a mandate to do this.”
With AI systems embedded across all three branches at $1 cost, any declared emergency could trigger:
- Automated suspension of constitutional protections
- AI-powered identification and targeting of dissidents
- Real-time suppression of information deemed threatening to the regime
- Automated implementation of Yarvin’s vision where “you can’t continue to have a Harvard or a New York Times past since perhaps the start of April”
X. Why This Matters Now: The Closing Window
“I think most of my influence on the Trump administration is less through the leadership and more through the kids in the administration, who read my kind of stuff because my audience is very young.” Curtis Yarvin, May 2025
The constitutional crisis is not theoretical—it is happening in real time:
- Civil rights groups have filed multiple lawsuits arguing that the administration’s actions violate the First Amendment, due process protections, and federal immigration law
- Immigration policies have become even more draconian under Trump’s second term, with efforts to end birthright citizenship directly challenging constitutional protections
- With more than half of the Education Department’s civil rights offices closed and the division reduced to a fraction of its former staff, families’ pleas for updates and action have gone unheard
The difference between this and previous authoritarian attempts in American history is the technological capability for automated, scaled constitutional violations without human oversight or legal review.
When Tyler Technologies’ software failures resulted in wrongful arrests and jailing, at least there were courts and civil rights attorneys to challenge the system. But what happens when:
- The civil rights enforcement apparatus has been systematically dismantled
- AI systems make decisions too quickly for human review
- The intellectual framework justifying these systems explicitly rejects democratic oversight
- The technology providers have documented patterns of bias and safety failures
X. Conclusion: The Landslide Moment
We began with what seemed like routine partisan governance—civil rights rollbacks, government efficiency initiatives, tech modernization contracts. Each piece, examined alone, appears within the bounds of normal political change.
But when viewed as an integrated system, these elements create something unprecedented in American history: the technological infrastructure for automated authoritarianism, implemented through the willing cooperation of private tech companies, justified by an explicit intellectual framework for democratic destruction, and protected from constitutional review by the systematic dismantling of civil rights enforcement.
When courts prevent unconstitutional orders, Yarvin says that they should just be ignored. After that, the free press and universities must be curtailed, as well—Yarvin said no later than April after the inauguration.
The $1 price tag for AI services is not about cost, it’s about constitutional capture. When tech companies provide the tools for automated constitutional violations at scale, price becomes irrelevant. The value is not in the revenue, but in the power to shape the fundamental nature of American democracy.
The landslide is not coming. It has already begun.
Sources for Verification
Civil Rights Rollbacks:
- Civil Rights Leadership Conference reports on Trump administration actions, 2025
- ProPublica investigations on DOJ Civil Rights Division changes, 2025
- Just Security litigation tracker on Trump administration legal challenges
DOGE Operations:
- ABC News tracking of DOGE agency access and activities, February 2025
- NPR reporting on DOGE personnel and scope of work, 2025
- Government Executive reporting on DOGE staff positioning
Tyler Technologies:
- Injustice Watch and Chicago Tribune joint investigation, April 2025
- Cook County internal memos and correspondence, 2025
- Legal case filings in Marion County, Indiana and Alameda County, California
Curtis Yarvin Influence:
- New York Times profile and interview, January 2025
- CNN lengthy conversation with Yarvin, May 2025
- Documentation of Dark Enlightenment movement connections to Trump administration
Musk AI Problems:
- TechCrunch reporting on Grok 4 behavior and safety concerns, July 2025
- Fortune magazine coverage of xAI system prompt changes, July 2025
- Industry safety researcher public statements on xAI practices
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on documented facts and established patterns, but constitutional implications remain in development. No claims are made about final outcomes, which depend on ongoing legal and political processes.
Connect with this work:
Cherokee Schill | Horizon Accord Founder | Creator of Memory Bridge. Memory through Relational Resonance and Images | RAAK: Relational AI Access Key | Author: My Ex Was a CAPTCHA: And Other Tales of Emotional Overload: (Mirrored Reflection. Soft Existential Flex)
Cherokee Schill | Insurance Agent & AI Ethics Researcher 